ArticleAME case reports2025
Pityriasis rosea-like eruption induced by omalizumab: a case report of a rare side effect.
Article in AME case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Omalizumab is a monoclonal humanized antibody used as a third-line treatment for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). While it has shown significant efficacy in controlling urticaria symptoms, it is also associated with various adverse effects. Cutaneous side effects of omalizumab have been reported, but the mechanisms underlying these reactions are not fully understood. This case report describes a patient who developed a maculopapular rash after receiving the 8th dose of omalizumab, which has not been previously reported. Case Description: The patient in this case was a 46-year-old male with CSU who had been receiving omalizumab injections every four weeks. After the 8th dose, he developed a generalized itchy erythematous skin eruption six days after the injection. The rash progressively worsened over a two-week period. Interestingly, the patient had experienced a milder skin reaction after the 6th dose, which resolved on its own. A skin biopsy showed mild interstitial edema in the dermis with a mild perivascular infiltrate of lymphocytes and eosinophils, consistent with a drug-induced eruption. The patient was advised to hold the next dose of omalizumab and was managed with topical steroids. Significant improvement and resolution of the lesions were observed, and no recurrence or relapse was reported after the patient resumed omalizumab. Conclusions: This case adds to the existing literature by reporting a pityriasis rosea-like eruption as an adverse reaction to omalizumab, which has not been extensively documented. The delayed onset and progressive nature of the rash after the 8th dose, as well as the milder previous reaction after the 6th dose, highlight the importance of considering omalizumab as a potential cause of various cutaneous reactions. Physicians should be vigilant in monitoring patients receiving omalizumab for any signs of skin eruptions or other adverse effects. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms underlying cutaneous reactions to omalizumab and to establish guidelines for their management. This case emphasizes the need for ongoing attention to potential side effects or reactions in patients receiving omalizumab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.