ArticleAME case reports2025
Interference of recombinant human interferon α2b in human chorionic gonadotropin assays: a case report and clinical analysis.
Article in AME case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recombinant human interferon α2b (rhIFN-α2b) is a widely used antiviral and immune-modulating agent. However, its potential to interfere with immunoassays, particularly human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) tests, has not been extensively documented. This case report highlights the challenges of interpreting hCG assay results in the context of rhIFN-α2b therapy. Case Description: A 24-year-old female presented with amenorrhea for over 40 days, and tested positive for urine hCG using the colloidal gold method (124 IU/L). However, her serum β-hCG measured by electrochemiluminescence was <0.200 IU/L, and her progesterone was 29.3 nmol/L. A further analysis across platforms revealed that the Roche, Beckman, and Mindray chemiluminescence methods were unaffected by rhIFN-α2b, while the colloidal gold urine hCG, quantitative immunochromatography, and Abbott chemiluminescence assays were affected by rhIFN-α2b. This interference likely stems from the immunomodulatory effects of rhIFN-α2b, which can cause non-specific binding to assay antibodies. Conclusions: This case underscores the importance of using multiple testing platforms and conducting thorough clinical assessments to avoid false-positive results. It also highlights the need for assay developers to consider epitope targeting in reagent design to minimize interference. Clinicians and laboratory professionals should be aware of the potential for rhIFN-α2b to cause assay interference and collaborate closely to ensure accurate interpretation of test results. This case calls for further research into the prevalence of rhIFN-α2b-induced hCG assay interference and the development of strategies to mitigate its impact on clinical diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.