Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40330928›Full record

ArticleAME case reports2025

Case series of adult Wilms' tumor and review of the literature.

Ying He, Fan Yang, Qi Gao, Yu Xiang, Zhong Chen, Xiaoqin Chen, Yang Luan

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in AME case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ying He *Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Fan Yang *Department of Nursing, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Qi GaoDepartment of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yu XiangDepartment of Urology, The People's Hospital of Honghu, Honghu, China.
Zhong ChenDepartment of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xiaoqin ChenDepartment of Nursing, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yang LuanDepartment of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7153-3814

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Adult Wilms' tumor (AWT) is extremely rare in clinics and very difficult to diagnose preoperatively. However, a unified treatment plan of AWT is lacking and the prognosis is unfavorable. This study will present the follow-up data of AWT cases in Tongji Hospital and discuss the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of AWT. Case Description: The clinical data of four AWT cases admitted to the Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology from August 2010 to January 2019 were followed up and analyzed. The mean age of the three males and one female patients was 38 years old. One case was admitted due to lumbar and abdominal distension, one case due to renal occupancy found on routine physical examination, and the other two cases due to lumbar pain with painless gross hematuria. The tumors were 4-10 cm in size, three of which were confined to the kidney, and one case invaded the inferior vena cava. Four cases were treated surgically: three with radical nephrectomy and one with partial nephrectomy. Two cases were treated with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (one case received the actinomycin D + vincristine regimen and pirarubicin + vincristine regimen; another case was treated with etoposide + carboplatin and cyclophosphamide + vincristine + adriamycin), and the other two cases were received postoperative follow-up only. Similar cases were reviewed in the literature. According to the postoperative pathology, one case was AWT germ type, two cases were AWT epithelial type, and one case was AWT mixed type. Two cases were classified in stage I, one case in stage II, and one case in stage III. All cases were followed up over 5 years, with two deaths and two survivals and a mean progression-free survival of 39 months. Conclusions: AWT is a relatively rare malignant tumor with a low preoperative diagnostic accuracy and a poorer prognosis than children. Early diagnosis, successful surgery, and standardized postoperative adjuvant therapy according to pathological typing and staging are the key points to improve the survival of AWT patients.

Indexed as

Adult Wilms’ tumor (AWT)case seriespostoperative adjuvant therapyprogression-free survivalrenal malignancy

Identifiers

PMID40330928
PMCPMC12053429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.