ReviewiScience2025
Toward a neuroaesthetics of interactions: Insights from dance on the aesthetics of individual and interacting bodies.
Review in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Embodied neuroaesthetics and the psychotherapeutic relational field.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Conceptualized Immersive Projection Environment (CIPE-NRTInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2025Article
- Individual abilities to estimate levels of movement synchrony predict action observation network activation.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuroaesthetics has advanced our understanding of the neural processes underlying human aesthetic evaluation of crafted and natural entities, including the human body. While much research has examined the neurocognitive mechanisms behind evaluating "single-body" forms and movements, the perception and aesthetic evaluation of multiple individuals moving together have only recently gained attention. This review examines the neural foundations of static and dynamic body perception and how neural representations of observed and executed movements influence their aesthetic evaluation. Focusing on dance, it describes the role of stimulus features and individual characteristics in movement aesthetics. We review neural systems supporting visual processing of social interactions and propose a role for these systems in the aesthetic evaluation of interpersonal interactions, defined as the neuroaesthetics of interactions. Our goal is to highlight the benefits of integrating insights and methods from social cognition, neuroscience, and neuroaesthetics to understand mechanisms underlying interaction aesthetics, while addressing future challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.