ReviewFrontiers in digital health2025
Interoperability of telemonitoring data in digital health solutions: a scoping review.
Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Wearable Devices for Remote Monitoring of Chronic Diseases: Systematic Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Pooled it
- Architectural patterns for health information systems: a systematic review.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Pooled it
- Unaddressed implications of the FDA's 2026 guidance on wellness devices.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Functional Integration of a Portable Non-Enzymatic Electrochemical Glucose Sensor in Simulation-Based Medical Education Through a Teleconsultation Workflow.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Stakeholder Perspectives on Affinity Domains in Digital Health Interoperability: Qualitative Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Stroke Rehabilitation, Novel Technology and the Internet of Medical Things.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Embedding Passive Monitoring Into Global Health and Longitudinal Patient Care.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Multi-sensor wearables re-shaping care of chronic heart-failure: A narrative review.The Indian journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Integrating Precision Medicine and Digital Health in Personalized Weight Management: The Central Role of Nutrition.Nutrients · 2025Review
- A Technological Review of Digital Twins and Artificial Intelligence for Personalized and Predictive Healthcare.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This scoping review explores the existing literature on the interoperability of telemonitoring systems in cross-border healthcare settings. It focuses on identifying technical standards, enablers, and barriers to effective telemonitoring data exchange across healthcare systems and geographies. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge, DBLP, and Scopus) from January 2000 to May 2023, using keywords such as "telemonitoring", "interoperability", "technical standards", and "cross-border data exchange". Eligibility criteria included peer-reviewed studies examining the interoperability of telemonitoring systems across healthcare providers and cross-border settings. A total of 861 studies were identified, and 25 met the inclusion criteria. Results: The review identified diverse technical standards, including HL7 FHIR, ISO/IEEE 11073, and IHE profiles, used in telemonitoring systems. However, significant gaps were found in the literature regarding the operational challenges of telemonitoring systems, particularly in cross-border contexts. Many studies focused on technical aspects, with fewer addressing organizational and legal issues. Data transport types, such as Bluetooth and REST APIs, were mentioned, but no common standard for data exchange between devices was identified. Discussion: The findings highlight the need for further research on the deployment of telemonitoring systems, particularly in cross-border contexts. The lack of harmonization in technical standards poses a barrier to achieving seamless interoperability. The review calls for the development of a robust framework to support telemonitoring integration across healthcare systems. Conclusions: While telemonitoring shows promise in improving healthcare delivery, significant interoperability challenges remain. Developing common standards at the European level is essential to enhance cross-border telemonitoring services and patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.