ArticleDEN open2026
A pilot study on anti-reflux mucoplasty with valve as novel endoscopic therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Article in DEN open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Utility of Anti-reflux Mucosal Intervention for Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Patients With a Hiatal Hernia.DEN open · 2027Article
- Changes in endoscopic pressure study integrated system (EPSIS) parameters after antireflux surgery and their association with postoperative clinical outcomes.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Closure-Focused Anti-Reflux Mucoplasty Compared With Conventional ARMS: A Propensity Score-Matched Study (With Video).Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Endoscopic anti-reflux therapies like anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) and anti-reflux mucosal ablation have shown efficacy for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Anti-reflux mucoplasty (ARM-P), a refinement of ARMS, incorporates immediate closure of the resection site to reduce complications. Recently, anti-reflux mucosal valvuloplasty (ARMV), which employs endoscopic submucosal dissection to create a mucosal valve, was introduced but retains ARMS's limitations, requiring extensive incisions (three-quarters to four-fifths circumference). To address these challenges, we developed anti-reflux mucoplasty with valve (ARM-P/V), integrating ARMV's valvuloplasty with ARM-P's closure technique to improve safety and reduce complications. This pilot study evaluates the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of ARM-P/V. Methods: This retrospective study reviewed data from patients undergoing ARM-P/V for proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-refractory or PPI-dependent GERD at Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, from April to August 2024. Symptom severity and quality of life were assessed using validated questionnaires (GERD-Health Related Quality of Life Questionnaire [GERD-HRQL], GERD Questionnaire [GerdQ], and Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of GERD [FSSG]), comparing pre- and post-treatment scores. PPI discontinuation rates were also analyzed. Results: Eighteen patients (mean age 55.4 years) underwent ARM-P/V. Within 3 months, 72.2% (13/18) reduced or discontinued PPI use. GERD-HRQL scores improved from 20.3 to 10.9 ( Conclusions: ARM-P/V demonstrates safety, technical feasibility, and short-term efficacy in GERD treatment. As a refinement of ARMV, it offers a promising alternative to current techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.