ArticleDEN open2026
Feasibility of a novel slim gastroscope for endoscopic submucosal dissection: A case series (with video).
Article in DEN open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Technical & clinical evaluation of a novel slim gastroscope in third-space procedures: Feasibility, subjective workload & system usability assessment.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection has transformed early-stage gastrointestinal tumor treatment. This series showcases a novel slim gastroscope's efficacy in tackling challenging lesions. Retrospective analysis of 17 patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection using the novel slim gastroscope for pharyngeal, esophageal, gastric, duodenal, and rectal lesions at our tertiary care center between November 2022 and July 2023. The slim scope has an outer diameter of 7.9 mm, an accessory channel diameter of 3.2 mm, and a downward bending angle of 160 degrees. Primary outcomes were en-bloc and R0 resection rate and secondary outcomes were procedure time, adverse events, and specimen/defect size. 100% successful en bloc and R0 resections were achieved with no significant adverse events. The median lesion size was 15 mm (2-40 mm), and the median procedure time was 30 min (5-105 min). Various strategies, including multiple tunnels, pocket creation, and endoscopic intermuscular dissection, were employed. The novel slim gastroscope is feasible for endoscopic submucosal dissection in many locations including the pharynx and duodenum and in certain complex lesions (large gastric lesions, rectal lesions with deep submucosal invasion, and circumferential esophageal lesions). This warrants further investigation through larger comparative studies to validate its efficacy and safety in a broader patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.