ReviewDEN open2026
Endoscopic management of acute cholecystitis in high-risk surgical patients: A comprehensive review article.
Review in DEN open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Technical Evolution, Clinical Application, and Outcomes of Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage in Acute Cholecystitis: A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Outcomes of Spiral Versus Conventional Double Pigtail Plastic Stents in Permanent Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage for Acute Cholecystitis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- What Does "High Risk" Mean in Surgical Patients?DEN open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute cholecystitis is frequently encountered in daily clinical practice, and early cholecystectomy is the standard therapy. In high-risk surgical patients, such as those with advanced age, deteriorated performance status, or underlying diseases, conservative treatment is typically preferred to manage acute cholecystitis. However, in patients with a disease that is refractory to conservative treatment, drainage procedures are necessary to control the infection. At present, there are three basic approaches for gallbladder drainage: percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage, endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage, and endoscopic ultrasound gallbladder drainage. Each of these methods has advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, the appropriate treatment method is determined on a case-by-case basis, and no consistent strategy for gallbladder drainage has been established. This review aimed to summarize the characteristics of each drainage method and compare the clinical outcomes of the three procedures for acute cholecystitis in high-risk surgical patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.