ArticleSurgery open science2025
Development of an interview practice course for improving overall confidence in specialty training national selection in vascular and general surgery.
Article in Surgery open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of a training course to improve surgical trainees' confidence in specialty training national selection (STNS) for higher surgical training in surgery. It was also the aim to identify weak areas in the current two-year core surgical training programme in the United Kingdom. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted. Delegates were asked to complete evaluation forms to track their perceived confidence levels of success in STNS at different timeframes, measured by a visual analogue scale. Setting: The 2-day interview preparation course was designed with a maximum delegate number of ten per course in Surgical Skills Centre, Ninewells Hospital, University of Dundee, UK. Participants: Twenty-seven delegates provided feedback of their perceived confidence levels of success at STNS higher surgical training in general and vascular surgery. Results: Delegate self-reported confidence increased significantly for all domains except Patient Communication (6.12 ± (1.75) vs 7.10 ± (1.69), P = 0.063). A lower confidence was reported by UK graduates and first-time applicants in the technical and teaching domain (6.03 ± 2.04 vs 7.24 ± 1.92, p = 0.007). 23 (85 %) of the participants were successful in the STNS post course. Conclusions: Peer-delivered teaching, practice and feedback as a structured interview practice course can significantly improve applicants' overall confidence levels in preparing for STNS and a high success rate at STNS. Patient communication skills training and education should be enhanced in the training programme. A lower confidence was reported by UK graduates and first-time applicants in the technical and teaching domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.