ArticleTrauma case reports2025
Bicycle impalement: A case series of penetrating handlebar injuries.
Article in Trauma case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Bicycles are among the most common means of transportation and recreation in children, and significant contributor to trauma in the pediatric population. Handlebars remain the most common bicycle part responsible for injuries, though most are blunt trauma. Few studies exist about bicycle impalement, or penetrating handlebar injuries, in children. The objective of this study is an overview of the evaluation, treatment and associated outcomes of these rare injuries. Case presentations: We review a total of 8 penetrating handlebar trauma cases in children at our pediatric trauma center over the course of 4 years. In the same time frame, our pediatric trauma center treated 2506 patients for bicycle-related trauma. Institutional review board (IRB) approval was obtained per protocol prior to the study. All 8 penetrating handlebar cases were secondary to impalement with the hand-brake portion of bicycle handlebars. Age, gender, immunization status, imaging, type of procedural intervention, medications given and outcomes at follow up visits are reviewed. Discussion: All 8 cases reviewed were in male patients, median age 9. 6 patients presented with penetrating injuries to the lower extremity, and 2 patients with injuries to the abdomen. All 8 cases were up to date on immunizations and received a dose of intravenous antibiotics at presentation. Plain film radiographs and CT images were obtained based on patient's clinical findings, and type of procedural intervention pursued was ultimately provider-dependent. All 8 patients were discharged on oral antibiotics, and all were noted to be healing well without signs of infection at follow-up. Conclusion: While rare, prompt recognition, evaluation and treatment of penetrating handlebar injuries in the pediatric population is imperative to improving clinical outcomes. Immediate evaluation includes patient's immunization status, decision to obtain imaging and operative intervention when indicated. Post-operative prophylactic antibiotics are not mandatory in cases of complete foreign body removal. Review of a larger number of penetrating handlebar cases could be pursued to further delineate best-practice protocols for this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.