Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40330835›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

Implementation of Goal-Oriented Care in Belgium: Experiences From 25 Primary Care Organisations.

Lotte Vanneste, Isabelle Heymans, Jean-Luc Belche, Ine Huybrechts, Dominique Van de Velde, Patricia De Vriendt, Reini Haverals, Dagje Boeykens, Sibyl Anthierens, Pauline Boeckxstaens

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lotte VannesteDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7976-5150
Isabelle HeymansDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Jean-Luc BelcheDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1720-6289
Ine HuybrechtsDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0288-1756
Dominique Van de VeldeDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6982-1075
Patricia De VriendtExpertise Centre Health and Care, Artevelde University of Applied Sciences, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4861-7838
Reini HaveralsDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4297-196X
Dagje BoeykensDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4062-5748
Sibyl AnthierensDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4762-1907
Pauline BoeckxstaensDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0445-2533

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Goal oriented care (GOC) and its readiness for implementation has been described in scientific literature, but research on GOC implementation in primary care organisations is limited. This study aims to capture the experiences of primary care organisations in implementing GOC in their context. Method: A qualitative study, with data triangulation, was conducted. Primary care organisations that experimented with the implementation of GOC in their context were followed. Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: Seven themes supporting GOC implementation were identified. Project leaders from the primary care organisations experienced that related concepts can serve as a foundation for initiating the implementation of GOC. The implementation process is an iterative and reflective process, with resistance viewed as an integral part of the process, offering opportunities for reflection. Collaborating with partners, especially the active participation of patients, was seen as a facilitator. Furthermore, having a clear vision for GOC is necessary. Projects invested in adapting tools and processes to align with GOC and provided relevant training. Discussion and conclusion: The findings led to recommendations that can guide the implementation of future GOC projects. Effective implementation extends beyond the development and adaptation of tools; it requires translating theoretical concepts into practical application and creating a shared vision on GOC.

Indexed as

goal-oriented careimplementationintegrated careprimary care

Identifiers

PMID40330835
PMCPMC12050686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.