ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2025
Health advocacy strategies to influence policy-making on and regulation of new and emerging tobacco and nicotine products in Latin America and the Caribbean.
Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To document health advocacy strategies to influence public policies regulating new and emerging tobacco and nicotine products in Latin America and the Caribbean. Methods: We analyzed public documents on new and emerging tobacco and nicotine products including news sources and national legislation and interviewed public health advocates in Latin America and the Caribbean. The policy dystopia model was used to assess health advocacy strategies for regulation of these products. Results: Legislative activity on these products mostly occurred in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica, Colombia, Mexico, and Panama. Health advocates engaged in four action-based strategies to influence regulation of these products - coalition management, information management, direct involvement in and access to the policy process, and litigation. Health advocates concentrated on exposing industry deception and providing scientific evidence and country experiences. Health advocacy argument-based strategies exposed the increased use of new and emerging tobacco and nicotine products due to aggressive industry marketing. Advocates argued governments should comply with the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) obligations and its Conference of the Parties (COP) decisions to regulate these products. Conclusions: Applying the policy dystopia model on new and emerging tobacco and nicotine products provides a better understanding of how health advocates can pre-empt industry strategies to undermine WHO FCTC implementation. Unified transnational cooperative and coordinated health advocacy strategies to educate people can strengthen efforts. Promoting WHO FCTC obligations and COP decisions appears to support regulation on new and emerging tobacco and nicotine products and should be replicated elsewhere.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.