ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2025
[Handmade ovitraps and hot water: auxiliary strategy to control
Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate handmade ovitraps as a sustainable auxiliary strategy to control Methods: Black and white ovitraps were designed using 0.95 L plastic containers, paper towel, and plastic film. Three treatments were tested: water, water with birdseed, and water with birdseed plus diflubenzuron, for 15 weeks, in Monteria and Ayapel, Colombia. The data were analyzed with Python Results: Ovitraps with birdseed, costing less than USD $0.20, achieved test positivity rates (TPR) above 78.0%, and captured an average of 385 eggs per trap per week. Over the entire study, approximately 100 ovitraps eliminated 67 868 eggs and prevented the development of 48 458 adults (47.2% female). Black traps (TPR: 54.47%) outperformed white traps (TPR: 41.24%), although no significant differences were due to color. Treatment with birdseed and diflubenzuron was the most effective. Manual egg counts were more accurate than AI counts. In addition, the use of hot water (80-100 °C) achieved 100% ovicidal efficacy, outperforming diflubenzuron. The community showed a high level of acceptance and reported significant benefits through mosquito reduction. Conclusion: Handmade ovitraps with paper towel immersed weekly in hot water, are a cost-effective, accessible, environmentally friendly strategy that can be easily integrated into vector control programs in urban and rural areas endemic for arboviral diseases, minimizing the use of insecticides and reducing environmental impacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.