ArticleCurrent medical mycology2024
Antifungal activity of almond (
Article in Current medical mycology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Various attempts have been made to find potent and effective alternatives with natural origin and fewer side effects for the current antifungals. This study aimed to determine the antifungal effects of the Hydroalcoholic Extract (HE) and Lyophilized Extract (LE) of Materials and Methods: Following the preparation of botanical compounds, the toxicity, cell viability, and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) of phenolic compounds analyses were assayed. The broth microdilution method was applied to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of fluconazole, LEs, and HEs against clinical isolates of Results: According to the HPLC results, the HEs and LEs comprised the main nine components, of which chlorogenic and tannic acids were the most abundant ones. Results of the toxicity assays revealed that no dilution of the extract was toxic to the cells, and the percentage of cell viability was similar to that of the control and above 90% in all dilutions. All isolates showed susceptibility to fluconazole (MIC range: 0.12-1 μg/mL). The MIC geometric mean values of Conclusion: Due to their insignificant side effects and cost-effectiveness, these extracts can be introduced as effective antifungals. Further
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.