ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025
Optimising prehospital trauma triage for older adults: challenges, limitations, and future directions.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chinese expert consensus on the prehospital management of major trauma.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2026Article
- The impacts of ageing-related changes on prehospital trauma care for older adults: challenges and future directions.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ageing population presents significant challenges for prehospital trauma care, with older adults experiencing higher rates of undertriage and overtriage due to age-related physiological changes, frailty, and polypharmacy. Standard trauma triage tools, primarily designed for younger populations, often fail to accurately assess injury severity in older adults, leading to delays in definitive care or unnecessary resource use. This narrative review synthesises current evidence on the limitations of existing trauma triage tools for older adults, highlighting challenges such as inconsistent implementation, paramedic training gaps, and age-related biases. The review explores the role of adjusted systolic blood pressure thresholds, frailty assessments, and geriatric-specific triage protocols in improving triage accuracy. While these modifications show promise, their integration into prehospital care remains limited due to logistical and clinical barriers. Key findings suggest that incorporating frailty assessments, refining age-specific triage criteria, and enhancing paramedic education can improve the precision of prehospital trauma triage for older adults. However, significant research gaps remain, including the need for large-scale prospective studies on geriatric-specific triage tools and investigations into the impact of triage modifications on long-term patient outcomes. Standardising geriatric triage protocols, leveraging digital decision-support tools, and addressing disparities in trauma centre access are critical to optimising prehospital care for older trauma patients. Future research should focus on refining triage strategies to enhance decision-making and ensure that older adults receive timely, appropriate trauma care, ultimately reducing preventable morbidity and improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.