SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025
The emerging role of next-generation sequencing in minimal residual disease assessment in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a systematic review of current literature.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Analysis Between the EuroClonality-NGS Approach and the LymphoTrackInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Extreme hyperleukocytosis and blueberry muffin skin lesions as the initial presentation of neonatal leukemia: a case report.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- [Evolving treatment landscape of pediatric acute leukemia: integration and breakthroughs in immunotherapy and targeted therapy].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2026Review
- Challenges and Advances in the Detection of Leukemic Blasts in Cerebrospinal Fluid in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Cancers · 2026Review
- A Large Concept Model for Mechanistic Simulation of Disease Trajectories: A Hypothesis-Generating Exemplar for Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Validation of an Adapted NGS-Based Clonality Assay for MRD Monitoring in B-ALL Using Archived and Follow-Up Samples.EJHaem · 2025Article
- Identification of Molecular Subtypes of B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Mexican Children by Whole-Transcriptome Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- False-Positive and False-Negative MRD Results in Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Navigating Between Scylla and Charybdis (Brief Review and Clinical Experience).Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Minimal residual disease (MRD) is a critical prognostic marker in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The well studied and used MRD detection methods, multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) for fusion genes and receptor gene rearrangements have significantly improved risk stratification, but have limitations in sensitivity and applicability. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has emerged as a promising approach for MRD assessment, offering better sensitivity and the ability to track clonal evolution. Objectives: This systematic review evaluates the clinical utility and prognostic value of NGS for MRD detection in ALL, comparing its performance with conventional methods and exploring its potential role in therapeutic guidance. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed and Web of Science following PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if they assessed MRD using NGS in ALL patients and provided data on sensitivity and prognostic value. Comparative analyses with MFC or qRT-PCR were considered. Data on end-of-induction MRD values, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) were extracted. Results: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. NGS demonstrated superior sensitivity in detecting MRD-positive cases compared to MFC in patients classified as MRD-negative. Higher correlation was observed in MRD-positive cases than in MRD-negative cases. NGS-based MRD stratification correlated strongly with clinical outcomes, with patients achieving NGS-MRD negativity exhibiting superior EFS and OS rates. Additionally, NGS was highly predictive of relapse following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and CAR-T cell therapy. The IGH rearrangements as the primary marker in NGS panels has demonstrated good prognostic value in B-ALL. Conclusion: NGS represents a transformative tool for MRD monitoring in ALL, offering enhanced sensitivity and prognostic accuracy. Challenges such as high costs, complex bioinformatics analysis and the need for standardization remain. While its integration into clinical practice holds significant promise, further research is needed to establish standardized protocols, cost-effectiveness, and its optimal role in treatment decision-making. The combination of NGS with MFC may provide complementary advantages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.