ArticleHealth science reports2025
A Comparative Prospective Study to Assess Efficacy of Intralesional MMR (Measles, Mumps, Rubella) Vaccine and Intralesional Vitamin D3 in Treatment of Nongenital Warts.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04428359 (A Comparative Study to Assess Efficacy of Intralesional MMR), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Comparative Study to Assess Efficacy of Intralesional MMR (Measles, Mumps, Rubella) Vaccine and Intralesional Vitamin D3 in Treatment of Warts
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Intralesional MMR Vaccine and Vitamin D3 in Managing Nongenital Warts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2026Pooled it
- Systematic Review of Intralesional Therapies for Cutaneous Warts.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Intralesional immunotherapy is an upcoming method of wart treatment with fewer side effects and this study aims to assess and compare the efficacy of intralesional MMR vaccine and vitamin D3 in the treatment of nongenital warts. Methods: A comparative prospective study was done with a total of 61 patients divided into two groups. Thirty-one patients were treated with intralesional MMR, while 30 patients received intralesional vitamin D3. In both groups, a maximum of five sessions were carried out every 3 weeks and follow-up was done for 3 months. Results: In the MMR group, 80.6% of patients achieved complete response, 6.5% had excellent response, 9.7% showed good response, and 3.2% had no response. Similarly, in the vitamin D3 group, 73.4% achieved complete response, 20.0% had excellent response, 3.3% showed good response and 3.3% had no response. The difference in response rates between the two groups was statistically insignificant. One patient (4.0%) in the MMR group and three patients (13.6%) in the vitamin D3 group experienced recurrence within 3 months of follow-up, but this difference was not statistically significant. Both treatments were well tolerated. Pain was universal, while swelling (60%), hyperpigmentation (30%), and pruritus (16.7%) were more common with vitamin D3. In logistic regression analysis, pain duration was significantly higher in the Vitamin D group compared to the MMR group ( Conclusions: Both intralesional MMR and vitamin D3 showed positive response and were well tolerated and comfortable modalities for the treatment of warts. However, recurrence rate and side effects were higher with Vitamin D3 than MMR. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04428359.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.