ArticleHealth science reports2025
Comparison of the Safety and Effectiveness of Labor Induction With 25 μg Versus 50 μg of Oral Misoprostol in Women With Premature Rupture of Membranes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: The recommended dosing regimens for oral misoprostol in labor induction include 25 μg every 2 h and 50 μg every 4 h. However, there is no specific protocol for these regimens at Shahid Akbarabadi Hospital. This study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the two dosing protocols for labor induction in women with premature rupture of membranes (PROM) and establish a tailored protocol to minimize maternal and neonatal complications. Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at Shahid Akbarabadi Hospital from 2021 to 2023, including pregnant women with term singleton pregnancies and confirmed PROM. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either 25 μg of oral misoprostol every 2 h (up to 12 doses) or 50 μg every 4 h (up to 6 doses). The primary outcome was the mode of delivery. Secondary outcomes included induction-to-delivery time, uterine tachysystole, postpartum hemorrhage, and neonatal complications. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square and Results: A total of 400 women were enrolled, with 200 in each group. The mean induction-to-delivery interval was significantly shorter in the 50 μg group ( Conclusion: Both dosing regimens of oral misoprostol were effective for labor induction, but the 50 μg dose was associated with a shorter induction-to-delivery time. The findings suggest that adjusting the misoprostol dosage may reduce complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.