Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40330758›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2025

Factors Affecting the Adoption of Electronic Prescription by Physicians and Pharmacists.

Mahdie ShojaeiBaghini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mahdie ShojaeiBaghiniStudent Research Committee, Faculty of Management and Medical Information Sciences Kerman University of Medical Sciences Kerman Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-9857-7347

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Electronic prescribing holds significant potential for improving healthcare quality and efficiency. However, its success relies on healthcare professionals' acceptance and use. This study investigated the factors influencing e-prescribing adoption among physicians and pharmacists in Iran, where its use has been mandated since December 2021. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2024 using a structured questionnaire to gather data from 189 physicians and pharmacists in Kerman, Iran. The data collection tool was a structured questionnaire divided into two sections: demographic information and research variables. The questionnaire measured key constructs based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). Data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0 and MPLUS 8.3.2 software. Results: A total of 171 individuals participated in our survey. The updated measurement model confirmed the presence of convergent and discriminant validity, as well as reliability and fit. Analysis of the structural model indicated that, at the 95% confidence level, perceived ease of use positively influences perceived usefulness, which in turn enhances trust in the e-prescribing system. Additionally, technology self-efficacy has a positive impact on attitudes toward using e-prescribing. Conclusions: This study presents valuable insights into the factors influencing the adoption of e-prescribing within the Iranian healthcare context. The findings carry significant implications for policymakers, system developers, and healthcare administrators aiming to enhance the implementation of e-prescribing and promote its widespread adoption. Furthermore, this study contributes to the broader discourse on health information technology adoption by emphasizing the critical importance of contextual factors in technology acceptance research.

Indexed as

electronic prescribinge‐prescribingpharmacistsphysicianstechnology acceptance

Identifiers

PMID40330758
PMCPMC12051435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.