Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40330737›Full record

ArticleHealthcare technology letters

Comparative Process Mining for Identifying the Critical Activities in Sepsis Trajectories.

Mohsen Mohammadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare technology letters. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mohsen MohammadiComputer Engineering Department Esfarayen University of Technology Esfarayen Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0532-1236

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis, a life-threatening condition with high mortality and readmission rates, demands precise and timely management to improve patient outcomes. Despite advancements, identifying the critical activities within sepsis treatment pathways remains a challenge, limiting the effectiveness of interventions. This study addresses this issue by utilising comparative process mining techniques to analyse sepsis trajectories, focusing on key performance metrics-sojourn time, arrival rate and finish rate-across distinct patient clusters. The analysis is based on real-life event logs from a hospital's sepsis cases, using K-means clustering to segment patients by age, severity and key clinical indicators. The study reveals critical activities such as 'Return ER', 'Admission IC', and 'Release C', which consistently exhibit high sojourn times and influence patient outcomes significantly. These activities emerge as bottlenecks in the patient care process, particularly in cases of severe sepsis, where delays can lead to increased complications and mortality. By identifying these critical points, the study provides actionable insights for healthcare providers to optimize resource allocation, reduce delays and enhance the overall efficiency of sepsis management. The findings underscore the importance of targeted interventions in these key areas, offering a path toward improved clinical outcomes and reduced sepsis-related mortality and readmission rates. This research contributes to the growing field of process mining in healthcare, highlighting its potential to transform complex clinical pathways into more efficient and effective treatment processes.

Indexed as

critical activityhealthcareprocess miningsepsis trajectories

Identifiers

PMID40330737
PMCPMC12051096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.