ArticleHealthcare technology letters
Comparative Process Mining for Identifying the Critical Activities in Sepsis Trajectories.
Article in Healthcare technology letters. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Conformance-Aware Predictive Process Monitoring for Early Detection of Sepsis Deterioration Using Incomplete Care Pathways.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis, a life-threatening condition with high mortality and readmission rates, demands precise and timely management to improve patient outcomes. Despite advancements, identifying the critical activities within sepsis treatment pathways remains a challenge, limiting the effectiveness of interventions. This study addresses this issue by utilising comparative process mining techniques to analyse sepsis trajectories, focusing on key performance metrics-sojourn time, arrival rate and finish rate-across distinct patient clusters. The analysis is based on real-life event logs from a hospital's sepsis cases, using K-means clustering to segment patients by age, severity and key clinical indicators. The study reveals critical activities such as 'Return ER', 'Admission IC', and 'Release C', which consistently exhibit high sojourn times and influence patient outcomes significantly. These activities emerge as bottlenecks in the patient care process, particularly in cases of severe sepsis, where delays can lead to increased complications and mortality. By identifying these critical points, the study provides actionable insights for healthcare providers to optimize resource allocation, reduce delays and enhance the overall efficiency of sepsis management. The findings underscore the importance of targeted interventions in these key areas, offering a path toward improved clinical outcomes and reduced sepsis-related mortality and readmission rates. This research contributes to the growing field of process mining in healthcare, highlighting its potential to transform complex clinical pathways into more efficient and effective treatment processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.