Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40330699›Full record

ReviewPeerJ2025

Phase separation in DNA repair: orchestrating the cellular response to genomic stability.

Juxin Deng, Zhaoyang Du, Lei Li, Min Zhu, Hongchang Zhao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juxin Deng *Department of Emergency Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui, China.
Zhaoyang Du *Department of Emergency Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui, China.
Lei LiDepartment of Emergency Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Institute of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Bengbu, Anhui, China.
Min ZhuSchool of Life Science, Anhui Agriculture University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Hongchang ZhaoDepartment of Emergency Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Institute of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Bengbu, Anhui, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA repair is a hierarchically organized, spatially and temporally regulated process involving numerous repair factors that respond to various types of damage. Despite decades of research, the mechanisms by which these factors are recruited to and depart from repair sites have been a subject of intrigue. Recent advancements in the field have increasingly highlighted the role of phase separation as a critical facilitator of the efficiency of DNA repair. This review emphasizes how phase separation enhances the concentration and coordination of repair factors at damage sites, optimizing repair efficiency. Understanding how dysregulation of phase separation can impair DNA repair and alter nuclear organization, potentially leading to diseases such as cancer and neurodegenerative disorders, is crucial. This manuscript provides a comprehensive understanding of the pivotal role of phase separation in DNA repair, sheds light on the current research, and suggests potential future directions for research and therapeutic interventions.

Indexed as

DNA RepairGenomic InstabilityAnimalsDNA DamageHumansPhase SeparationDNA damage response (DDR)DNA repairGenome instabilityPhase separation

Identifiers

PMID40330699
PMCPMC12051939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.