ArticleSubstance abuse and rehabilitation2025
Patient Perspectives on a Rapid Access, Walk-in, Medication for Addiction Treatment Clinic.
Article in Substance abuse and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Therapeutic Content for Substance Use Disorder Treatment: Development and Evaluation Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Centering Patient Voices: Implementing Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment to Address Risky Substance Use in Family Planning Clinics.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Rapid access addiction medicine (RAAM) walk-in clinics offer low-barrier, prompt treatment for substance use disorders (SUDs). These models differ from bridge clinics, which primarily address the barriers of transitioning between inpatient and outpatient SUD treatment settings. Previous RAAM models have been shown to be effective in urban areas. Through patient interviews, this qualitative study sought to describe the unique challenges and successes of a RAAM clinic that serves a primarily rural area. Patients and Methods: Adult patients with a SUD who utilized a medication for addiction treatment (MAT) walk-in clinic participated in semi-structured, recorded interviews. Participants were asked about facilitators and barriers to attaining treatment, as well as their perspectives/experiences and unmet wants/needs. Interviewee responses were transcribed, qualitatively coded, and analyzed for prominent trends. Results: Twelve patients participated. Stigma, lack of rural treatment options, and accessibility concerns were identified as general barriers to receiving SUD care. MAT walk-in clinic specific barriers included distance to clinic, clinic hours, and transportation. Patients identified the clinic's walk-in structure as a primary facilitator of receiving quality SUD care and felt the clinic offered a non-judgmental and accessible environment, differing positively from past treatments. Unmet wants and needs that patients identified included more extensive social services and communication after leaving the clinic. Conclusion: This MAT walk-in clinic is the only RAAM-style clinic offering same-day dual-diagnosis medication management in the state of Iowa. The walk-in structure was a key facilitator for patients accessing initial care. Expanding RAAM models in rural areas and incorporating telehealth may help address proximity barriers reported by patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.