ArticleJHLT open2025
Outcomes of lung transplantation for scleroderma versus other indications: Insigts from a single center.
Article in JHLT open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Scleroderma is an autoimmune disease affecting the skin and internal organs, with pulmonary disease being the leading cause of mortality. Lung transplantation is a potential therapy, but its indication has been limited by concerns about complications, such as esophageal dysmotility. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 959 lung transplant patients from 2011 to 2023, including 77 with scleroderma-related lung disease. Survival rates, post-transplant complications, such as chronic lung allograft dysfunction, and acute cellular rejection rates. Results: Scleroderma patients had higher mean pulmonary arterial pressure (32 vs. 24 mmHg, p < 0.001) and increased esophageal dysmotility (85% vs. 27%, p < 0.001). Double lung transplantation was more common (99% vs. 87%, p = 0.003). Scleroderma patients experienced higher rates of delayed chest closure (44% vs. 25%, p < 0.001), severe primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours (30% vs. 17%, p = 0.006), and longer mechanical ventilation (median 7 vs. 4 days, p = 0.002). They also required more gastrojejunostomy tubes (79% vs. 20%, p < 0.001) and had longer ICU stays (median 12 vs. 8 days, p = 0.007). However, adjusted competing risks regression showed no significant association between scleroderma and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (HR 0.69 [0.33 - 1.46], p = 0.31) or survival (HR 0.90 [0.56 - 1.45], p = 0.68). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that lung transplantation might be an important therapeutic option for patients with scleroderma, showing outcomes similar to those of patients with different underlying conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.