Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40330655›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Experiences of families when a member is in forensic psychiatric care: a phenomenologically based thematic interview study.

Gustav Björnberg, Ulrica Hörberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gustav BjörnbergDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.
Ulrica HörbergDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This article focuses on the meaning of being a family when a member of the family is cared for in forensic psychiatric care. The latter operates at the crossroads of psychiatric services and the legal system, making it a highly complex area of care. Families play a vital role in supporting recovery from mental illness, however, when a family member has committed a crime and suffers from severe mental illness, pressure and stress of a complex nature are felt by the family. The aim of this study was to describe the lived experiences of families when a member is in forensic psychiatric care. Material and methods: Seven family interviews (15 participants) were conducted and analyzed with a Reflective lifeworld approach in this phenomenological study. Results: The findings reveal four themes; Being constantly affected by uncertainty; A struggle to maintain family relations - overcoming barriers in the form of restrictions; Trying to help despite inherent powerlessness and It is not just the patient who needs to heal when the family is wounded. Conclusion: A family with a family member who is being cared for in forensic psychiatric care have support needs that are not fulfilled, even though these have been highlighted from several different perspectives. Healthcare professionals might be able to provide substantial support to the family by using simple yet effective methods, such as active listening and empathetic communication. By fostering an open dialogue and understanding, caregivers can help bridge gaps and facilitate better outcomes. A family-oriented practice should thus become a fundamental component of caregiving strategies in forensic psychiatric care.

Indexed as

experiencefamily perspectiveforensic psychiatryphenomenologyqualitative methodology

Identifiers

PMID40330655
PMCPMC12053012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.