ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Case Report: The intersection of psychiatry and medicine: diagnostic and ethical insights from case studies.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Overview of Severe Myalgic Encephalomyelitis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- A retrospective cohort study on the bidirectional association between depression and chronic kidney disease.Frontiers in nephrology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The intersection of psychiatry and medicine presents unique diagnostic and ethical challenges, particularly for conditions involving significant brain-body interactions, such as psychosomatic, somatopsychic, and complex systemic disorders. This article explores the historical and contemporary issues in diagnosing such conditions, emphasizing the fragmentation of medical and psychiatric knowledge, biases in clinical guidelines, and the mismanagement of complex illnesses. Diagnostic errors often arise from insufficient integration between general medicine and psychiatry, compounded by the reliance on population-based guidelines that neglect individual patient needs. Misclassification of conditions like myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), Lyme disease, and fibromyalgia as psychosomatic or psychogenic has led to stigmatization and delayed care. While these conditions are referenced as emblematic examples of misclassified and poorly understood disorders, the five clinical cases discussed in this article do not directly illustrate these diseases. Instead, they exemplify shared diagnostic and ethical dilemmas at the medicine-psychiatry interface, including uncertainty, fragmentation, and the risk of epistemic injustice. The article critically examines terms like medically unexplained symptoms and functional disorders, highlighting their limitations and potential for misuse. Case examples underscore the consequences of diagnostic inaccuracies and the urgent need for improved approaches. Ethical considerations are also explored, emphasizing respecting patient experiences, promoting individualized care, and acknowledging the inherent uncertainties in medical diagnosis. Advances in technologies such as brain imaging and molecular diagnostics offer hope for bridging the gap between psychiatry and medicine, enabling more accurate assessments and better patient outcomes. The article concludes by advocating comprehensive training at the medicine-psychiatry interface and a patient-centered approach that integrates clinical observation, research insights, and a nuanced understanding of mind-body dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.