ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2025
Study protocol: Apps and peer support for a healthy future and living well with diabetes (APHLID-M).
Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mental health conditions are common among non-pregnant young people with any form of diabetes, affecting diabetes self-management and increasing complications risk. Limited evidence exists on whether smartphone applications "apps" combining diabetes and mental health (MH) support can improve self-management and MH in these young people. The Apps and Peer support for a Healthy future and Living Well with Diabetes (APHLID-M) multicentre study includes two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) testing such an app, aimed at reducing distress among young adults with diabetes with and without a mental health condition (MHC). Methods and analysis: An app containing diabetes and MH resources was configured onto a pre-existing, digital health platform. Young adults aged 16-30 years with diabetes will be recruited from eight Australian outpatient clinics, screened using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) and the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) questionnaires. Based on MH status, participants will be allocated to the primary RCT (MHC group) or a nested-exploratory RCT (No-MHC group) and randomised by site to the "app" (Intervention) or "no app" (control). All participants will have access to peer support and will continue to receive standard diabetes care through their clinic. Recruitment will end once 142 participants are enrolled in the primary RCT. The primary outcome is change in psychological distress (K10), and the secondary outcome change in HbA1c, assessed at baseline and 6 months. Discussion: APHLID-M will offer valuable insights into effects of digital technology in enhancing MH (particularly distress) physical health and well-being in young people with diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.