Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40330543›Full record

ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2025

Clinical insights into the role of bepridil in recurrence prevention after ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation.

Moyuru Hirata, Koichi Nagashima, Ryuta Watanabe, Yuji Wakamatsu, Naoto Otsuka, Shu Hirata, Masanaru Sawada, Yuji Saito, Sayaka Kurokawa, Kenta Murotani and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Irrigation-dependent acute ganglionated plexus modulation during variable-loop pulsed field ablation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Moyuru HirataDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Nihon University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2701-486X
Koichi NagashimaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Nihon University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2326-225X
Ryuta WatanabeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Nihon University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2664-7139
Yuji WakamatsuDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Nihon University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1540-8514
Naoto OtsukaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Nihon University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Shu HirataDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Nihon University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0226-466X
Masanaru SawadaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Nihon University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9663-7617
Yuji SaitoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Nihon University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Sayaka KurokawaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Nihon University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Kenta MurotaniBiostatistics Center Kurume University School of Medicine Kurume Fukuoka Japan.
Yasuo OkumuraDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Nihon University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2960-4241

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The role of bepridil in preventing atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence following ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF) remains uncertain, particularly in patients with severe atrial substrates. Methods: This retrospective study included 232 consecutive PerAF patients who underwent AF ablation between 2014 and 2019. Among them, 162 received bepridil for 3 months post-ablation (Bepridil group), while 70 received no antiarrhythmic drugs (No-AADs group). Baseline characteristics, procedural details, and outcomes were compared. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression models were used to evaluate AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence, with bepridil use treated as a time-dependent covariable. Results: The Bepridil group had a higher body mass index (25.1 ± 3.7 vs. 23.8 ± 3.9), a higher prevalence of patients with a LAD >40 mm and a LAV >50 mL (67.9% vs. 47.1%, 64.2% vs. 48.5%, respectively), and lower left atrial appendage flow velocity (37.6 ± 15.0 vs. 42.7 ± 20.5 cm/min). They more frequently underwent intracardiac atrial cardioversion (61.7% vs. 40.0%) and additional extra-pulmonary vein ablation (35.2% vs. 15.7%), but were less likely to receive balloon-based ablation (39.5% vs. 62.9%) ( Conclusion: Bepridil may have a limited role in preventing AF/AT recurrence in PerAF patients, particularly those with severe atrial substrates. However, its overall impact appears to be small, warranting further investigation.

Indexed as

atrial fibrillationballoon ablationcatheter ablationradiofrequency ablation

Identifiers

PMID40330543
PMCPMC12051097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.