Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40330532›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in insect science2025

Targeting the

Juan Carlos Conde-Bravo, María Fernández-Bravo, Inmaculada Garrido-Jurado, Meelad Yousef-Yousef, Enrique Quesada-Moraga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in insect science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juan Carlos Conde-BravoLaboratory of Agricultural Entomology, Department of Agronomy, María de Maeztu Excellence Unit DAUCO, ETSIAM, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain.
María Fernández-BravoLaboratory of Agricultural Entomology, Department of Agronomy, María de Maeztu Excellence Unit DAUCO, ETSIAM, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain.
Inmaculada Garrido-JuradoLaboratory of Agricultural Entomology, Department of Agronomy, María de Maeztu Excellence Unit DAUCO, ETSIAM, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain.
Meelad Yousef-YousefLaboratory of Agricultural Entomology, Department of Agronomy, María de Maeztu Excellence Unit DAUCO, ETSIAM, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain.
Enrique Quesada-MoragaLaboratory of Agricultural Entomology, Department of Agronomy, María de Maeztu Excellence Unit DAUCO, ETSIAM, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Methods: Experiments were conducted in early spring, and efficacy was evaluated using the Henderson-Tilton formula, as well as by analyzing changes in the relative population density of both nymphs and adults. Results and discussion: The fungus was detected in the soil and endophytically in the natural cover throughout the 8 days monitoring period, in which the fungal treatment significantly reduced both the nymph and the adult populations. Notably, the efficacy of the fungal treatment was 100.0% and 85.0% for foams and adults in 2023, and 62.5% and 72.0% for foams and adults in 2024, respectively. Results indicate a significant reduction in the population density of both vector developmental stages, highlighting the potential of this fungal strain for managing

Indexed as

aphrophoridaebiological control agentolive quick decline syndromePhilaenus spumariuspierce-sucking insects

Identifiers

PMID40330532
PMCPMC12051512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.