ArticleNorthern clinics of Istanbul2025
Effective new predictors of prognosis and comparison of multidisciplinary treatment options in acute mesenteric ischemia.
Article in Northern clinics of Istanbul, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Factors in Acute Intestinal Ischemia: A Comparative, Retrospective, Single-Center Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIt was aimed to compare the prognostic risk factors and multidisciplinary treatments affecting mortality in acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI).
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 111 patients treated for acute mesenteric ischemia between January 2012 and January 2023. Patients were divided into 2 groups as alive and dead for early survey (postoperative 28 days). The characteristics of the two groups were compared and the factors affecting early mortality were investigated. Factors affecting the presence of perioperative ischemia, the length of ischemia, the length of the resected bowel, and the length of the remaining small bowel from the ligament of Treitz were investigated. The results of different treatment processes were analyzed.
resultsThe mean age was 71.67, years with 64 (57.6%) males and 47 (42.3%) females. Early mortality rate was 47.7%. Envas was applied to 9 (8.1%) patients. EnvasSurg to 19 (17.1%) patients. Surg to 71 (64%) and SurgEnvas to 12 (10.8%) patients during the treatment process. Preoperative D-dimer (p=0.013). lactate (p=0.006). creatine (p=0.001). LAR (p=0.031) were significantly different between the groups when compared according to the treatment process. The resected bowel length was significantly less in patients who underwent EnvasSurg compared to the other groups (p=0.002), CCI (p=0.041), D-dimer (p=0.016), lactate (p<0.001), creatine (p<0.001), LAR (p<0.001) and ischemia length (p<0.001) were found to be significantly different between the groups.
conclusionThe prognosis can be predicted with serum-based blood tests and indicators at the time of diagnosis, and organ loss and prognosis can be changed with the selected treatment process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.