ArticleNorthern clinics of Istanbul2025
Retrospective investigation of patients undergoing splenectomy: Our 8-year clinical experience in a single center.
Article in Northern clinics of Istanbul, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Splenic Hamartoma Diagnosed and Treated by Laparoscopic Splenectomy Associated With a Minimal Suprapubic Approach.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveElective splenectomy is often performed due to hematological diseases. In this study, we aimed to investigate the splenectomy procedures performed in our clinic under emergency and elective conditions by analyzing the surgical techniques applied, surgical indications, and the clinical and demographic data of the patients, while seeking to discuss this subject, which holds a significant place in general surgical practice, in light of current literature.
methodsPatients who underwent splenectomy surgery in the general surgery clinic of a tertiary care hospital between September 2016 and September 2024 were included in the study. Clinical and demographic data of the patients were collected retrospectively through the hospital information management system records.
resultsThe mean age of 89 patients included in the study was 41.0±18.8 years (18-76 years). The male/female ratio was 1.3/1. The most common indication for splenectomy was trauma (38.2%). This was followed by mass (29.2%), splenomegaly (14.6%), and immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) (14.6%). Of the patients, 62.9% underwent open surgery, while 37.1% were operated on using the laparoscopic technique. Of the patients, 57.3% underwent elective surgery, while emergency surgery was planned for 42.7%.
conclusionWhile splenectomy is a life-saving intervention in emergency conditions, it has become the most important treatment in some hematological diseases. Firstly, accurate surgical indication and the selection of an appropriate surgical technique tailored to the patient are of critical importance. There are still controversial issues in the current literature regarding the indications for splenectomy and the surgical technique to be applied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.