ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025
Artificial intelligence in autoimmune diseases: a bibliometric exploration of the past two decades.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances and pitfalls in anti-double-stranded DNA autoantibody detection and interpretation.World journal of biological chemistry · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in rheumatology: a cross-sectional Scopus-based analysis.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in immunotherapy: revolutionizing diagnostic and therapeutic applications in cancer and autoimmune diseases.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- Drug-disease interactions in inflammation: mechanisms, clinical Impact, and future directions.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Rheumatology: Quo Vadis?Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2025Article
- Endocrine polyautoimmunity: Mechanistic insights and the future of AI-driven diagnostics.EXCLI journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Autoimmune diseases have long been recognized for their intricate nature and elusive mechanisms, presenting significant challenges in both diagnosis and treatment. The advent of artificial intelligence technology has opened up new possibilities for understanding, diagnosing, predicting, and managing autoimmune disorders. This study aims to explore the current state and emerging trends in the field through bibliometric analysis, providing guidance for future research directions. Methods: The study employed the Web of Science Core Collection database for data acquisition and performed bibliometric analysis using CiteSpace, HistCite Pro, and VOSviewer. Results: Over the past two decades, 1,695 publications emerged in this research field, including 1,409 research articles and 286 reviews. This investigation unveils the global development landscape predominantly led by the United States and China. The research identifies key institutions, such as Brigham & Women's Hospital, influential journals like the Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, distinguished authors including Katherine P. Liao, and pivotal articles. It visually maps out the research clusters' evolutionary path over time and explores their applications in patient identification, risk factors, prognosis assessment, diagnosis, classification of disease subtypes, monitoring and decision support, and drug discovery. Conclusion: AI is increasingly recognized for its potential in the field of autoimmune diseases, yet it continues to face numerous challenges, including insufficient model validation and difficulties in data integration and computational power. Significant advancements have been demanded to enhance diagnostic precision, improve treatment methodologies, and establish robust frameworks for data protection, thereby facilitating more effective management of these complex conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.