ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Advancing personalized, predictive, and preventive medicine in bladder cancer: a multi-omics and machine learning approach for novel prognostic modeling, immune profiling, and therapeutic target discovery.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative multi-omics identifies a glycosylation-based prognostic framework and nominates ALG3 for targeted therapy in bladder cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Multi-omics and artificial intelligence for precision drug discovery and potential clinical applications.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Multi-omics identification of a programmed cell death-related signature and potential target P4HB for bladder cancer based on a 101-combination machine learning and experimental validation.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Article
- Glycolysis-mediated H3K18la modifications drive aggressive bladder cancer through metabolic and epigenetic reprogramming.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Bladder Cancer Biomarkers: Recent Advances in Early Detection, Treatment Prediction, and Prognosis.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Integrative multi-omics profiling for early diagnosis, stratification and personalized management of chronic kidney disease: a new paradigm.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis and Management of Cancers: Potentials and Challenges.MedComm · 2025Review
- Lipid-Driven Immunometabolism in Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: A New Axis for Musculoskeletal Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Identification of immunogenic cell death signature genes in hepatocellular carcinoma: from single-cell transcriptomics toFrontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Exploring of bladder cancer immune-related genes and potential therapeutic targets based on transcriptomic data and Mendelian randomization analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to identify and analyze immunogenic cell death (ICD)-related multi-omics features in bladder cancer (BLCA) using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and bulk RNA-seq data. By integrating these datasets, we sought to construct a prognostic signature (ICDRS) and explore its clinical and biological implications, including its association with immune cell infiltration, tumor microenvironment (TME), and drug sensitivity. Methods: Publicly available datasets from TCGA and GEO, including scRNA-seq (GSE222315, 9 samples) and bulk RNA-seq (TCGA-BLCA, 403 samples; GSE13507, 160 samples), were analyzed. Single-cell data were processed using Seurat, and ICD scores were calculated using single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA). Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) identified ICD-related modules, and machine learning algorithms (Lasso, Ridge, CoxBoost) were employed to construct the ICDRS. Survival analysis, immune infiltration, pathway enrichment, and drug sensitivity were evaluated to validate the model. Results: The ICDRS, based on eight key genes (IL32, AHNAK, ANXA5, FN1, GSN, CNN3, FXYD3, CTSS), effectively stratified BLCA patients into high- and low-risk groups with significant differences in overall survival (OS, P < 0.001). High ICDRS scores were associated with immune-suppressive TME, including increased infiltration of T cells CD4 memory resting (P = 0.02) and macrophages M0/M1/M2 (P = 0.01). Pathway enrichment revealed correlations with cholesterol homeostasis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and KRAS signaling. Drug sensitivity analysis showed high-risk groups were resistant to Cisplatin (P = 0.003), Mitomycin C (P = 0.01), and Paclitaxel (P = 0.004), with IC50 values significantly higher than low-risk groups. Conclusion: The ICDRS serves as a robust prognostic biomarker for BLCA, offering insights into tumor immune evasion mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets. Its integration with clinical features enhances personalized treatment strategies, highlighting the importance of ICD in BLCA immunotherapy and precision medicine. The model's predictive accuracy and biological relevance were validated across multiple datasets, underscoring its potential for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.