ArticleCureus2025
Heart Failure Treatment in Underserved Populations: A Comprehensive Analysis of Sacubitril/Valsartan and Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitor (SGLT2i) Prescription Trends at a Safety Net Hospital.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Sacubitril/valsartan and sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are emerging classes of medications that have become key components of guideline-directed medical therapy for patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction and New York Heart Association class II, III, or IV symptoms. Both sacubitril/valsartan and SGLT2is have demonstrated the ability to improve morbidity and mortality in HF patients. This analysis evaluates current prescribing trends of sacubitril/valsartan and SGLT2is in a safety net hospital setting. Methods In this retrospective study, a chart review was conducted to identify sacubitril/valsartan use, categorized by drug dose and prescriber specialty, at University Health Truman Medical Centers in Kansas City, Missouri, USA, from October 1, 2021, to October 31, 2022. A second chart review similarly identified SGLT2i usage, also categorized by drug dose and prescriber specialty, within the same time frame and healthcare system. Results Of the 769 patients prescribed sacubitril/valsartan, 497 (64.6%) were prescribed the 24 mg/26 mg dose, 193 patients (25.1%) received the 49 mg/51 mg dose, and 79 patients (10.3%) were on the 97 mg/103 mg dose. Cardiologists accounted for only 23.3% of sacubitril/valsartan prescriptions, while ancillary staff, including nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and pharmacists, accounted for the majority (49.8%) of prescriptions. Regarding SGLT2is, 2,287 patients were prescribed these medications: 343 patients were prescribed dapagliflozin (188 at the 5 mg dose and 155 at the 10 mg dose); one patient received ertugliflozin at the 5 mg dose; 634 patients were prescribed canagliflozin (404 at the 100 mg dose, 173 at the 300 mg dose, 40 at the 50 mg dose with metformin combination, and 17 at the 150 mg dose with metformin combination); and 1,309 patients were prescribed empagliflozin (972 at the 10 mg dose, 333 at the 25 mg dose, two at the 5 mg dose with metformin combination, and two at the 12.5 mg dose with metformin combination). Cardiologists prescribed only 10.0% of SGLT2is, while internal/family medicine physicians accounted for the majority (52.3%) of prescriptions. Conclusions Robust evidence supports the use of sacubitril/valsartan and SGLT2is in HF, with both also proving effective for treating other diseases commonly coexisting with HF. The observed dosing patterns and distribution of prescribers reflect the broad utility of these novel therapeutics in diverse clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.