ArticleCureus2025
Knowledge and Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals on Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Prehospital Emergency Care in Portugal.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is an innovative and valuable tool in prehospital emergency medicine, facilitating faster and more accurate diagnoses while minimizing the need for invasive procedures. This study aimed to explore the knowledge and perspectives of prehospital emergency physicians and nurses in Portugal regarding POCUS and to assess the perceived benefits and barriers to its implementation in prehospital emergency care. Methods An online survey was conducted among prehospital emergency physicians and nurses in Portugal between November 2023 and January 2024. The questionnaire assessed respondents' knowledge of POCUS, its use in both hospital and prehospital settings, and their perceptions of its relevance and feasibility in emergency care. Results A total of 110 responses were received. Of these, 105 (95.5%) acknowledged the benefits of POCUS. While 66 (60%) reported having knowledge of POCUS, only five (4.5%) used it in prehospital care. The primary barriers to its use were the lack of equipment and specialized training. Most respondents gained their POCUS knowledge through self-funded courses or self-learning. Nineteen (18.1%) indicated insufficient knowledge for its application. Despite these limitations, 102 (92.7%) considered the inclusion of POCUS in prehospital services to be relevant. Conclusions Prehospital physicians and nurses in Portugal recognize the value of POCUS, but its application is hindered by a lack of equipment and structured training. Strategic investments in training programs and portable ultrasound devices are essential to support its broader implementation in prehospital emergency care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.