ArticleCureus2025
Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair Versus Lichtenstein's Open Hernia Repair for Inguinal Hernias: A Retrospective Study of 120 Cases.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differences in Long-term Quality of Life Assessed by the EuraHS-QoL Scale between Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair and Lichtenstein Tension-Free Repair for Primary Unilateral Inguinal Hernia.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- Comparison of TAPP and open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repairs in India.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInguinal hernia repair is one of India's most common procedures in general surgery. The advent of minimally invasive surgery for this condition has revolutionized its treatment. This study compares the outcomes of transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair and Lichtenstein's open hernia repair, focusing on specific intraoperative and perioperative outcomes. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent either TAPP repair or open hernia repair at a single tertiary care center between June 2021 and June 2024. A total of 120 patients were included, with Group A comprising 60 patients who underwent TAPP repair and Group B comprising 60 patients who underwent open hernia repair. In addition to demographic data, parameters such as operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative pain score using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and incidence of postoperative complications were analyzed. Statistical comparisons were made using chi-square and t-tests, with a significance level set at p < 0.05.
resultsThe mean operative time for Group A and Group B was 137.43 ± 24.41 minutes and 108.91 ± 36.73 minutes, respectively, which was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Although individual complications varied, the complications were 11.66% (seven patients) in Group A and 38.33% (23 patients) in Group B. The VAS revealed that the average pain score at 24-48 hours was 4.05 ± 0.80 in Group A and 4.3 ± 0.74 in Group B, indicating a statistically significant lower pain level in Group A (p = 0.03). At the end of one week, the average pain score was significantly lower in Group A (1.18 ± 0.42 vs. 1.55 ± 0.67, p < 0.001). The average duration of hospital stay was 2.3 ± 0.64 days for Group A and 3.01 ± 0.911 days for Group B. An unpaired t-test showed statistically significant differences between the two groups' hospital stay duration and time taken to return to normal work (t = 4.98, p < 0.001 and t = 14.041, p < 0.001, respectively). The average number of days for which analgesics were required was 1.1 in Group A and 1.6 in Group B.
conclusionsTAPP repair offers significant advantages in terms of postoperative pain and recovery time compared to traditional open hernia repair. Although TAPP repair requires a longer operative time, its benefits, such as reduced recovery duration and lower postoperative pain, could lead to better patient outcomes and reduced strain on healthcare resources. Both techniques showed comparable complications and hernia recurrence rates, suggesting that TAPP repair is a safe and effective alternative to open hernia repair. Future studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are recommended to further assess the long-term efficacy and cost-effectiveness of TAPP repair compared to open hernia repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.