Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40330353›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Role of Peroneal Tenography in Chronic Peroneal Disorders: A Service Evaluation.

Sandeep Munshi, Ranjith Nair, Rajiv Nair, Aditya Soni, Vaisakh Reghuram, Sivasankaran Munuswamy, Nadeem Baqai, Hariprasath Kanesan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sandeep MunshiTrauma and Orthopaedics, Furness General Hospital, University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust, Barrow in Furness, GBR.
Ranjith NairTrauma and Orthopaedics, Furness General Hospital, University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust, Barrow in Furness, GBR.
Rajiv NairTrauma and Orthopaedics, Furness General Hospital, University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust, Barrow in Furness, GBR.
Aditya SoniTrauma and Orthopaedics, Furness General Hospital, University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust, Barrow in Furness, GBR.
Vaisakh ReghuramTrauma and Orthopaedics, Furness General Hospital, University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust, Barrow in Furness, GBR.
Sivasankaran MunuswamyTrauma and Orthopaedics, Furness General Hospital, University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust, Barrow in Furness, GBR.
Nadeem BaqaiTrauma and Orthopaedics, Furness General Hospital, University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust, Barrow in Furness, GBR.
Hariprasath KanesanTrauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose The aims were to investigate if there was a diagnostic difference between peroneal tenography and MRI to guide the management of peroneal tendon disorders with the secondary aim to investigate the therapeutic effect of peroneal tenography. Methods A retrospective study was carried out over a 75-month period, including all patients over 18 years who presented with ankle injuries to identify patients with peroneal tendon disorders. Symptomatic patients were investigated using MRI and peroneal tenography. This was also compared with intraoperative findings of peroneal tendons. Fischer's exact test was used to determine the diagnostic difference between peroneal tenography as compared to MRI. The therapeutic effect of peroneal tenography was also calculated. Results The cohort consisted of 27 patients (20 females and 7 males), with the median age being 50 years and the mean BMI being 31.9. The follow-up period after the final management plan was 12 months before discharge from care. Findings from peroneal tenography were more likely to match intraoperative findings than MRI when compared with intraoperative findings (p=0.033). Fifteen out of the 27 patients who underwent peroneal tenography reported adequate pain relief following the procedure. Conclusion Peroneal tenography is more sensitive and specific in determining peroneal tendon disorders as compared to MRI and plays a role as a therapeutic intervention in ankle pain management for these patients.

Indexed as

ankle mrichronic ankle painlateral ankle imagingperoneal tendon injurytenography

Identifiers

PMID40330353
PMCPMC12051077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.