ArticleCureus2025
Current Architectural and Developmental Approaches in Artificial Intelligence Models for Prostate Cancer Detection and Management: A Technical Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Model Machine Learning for Survival Predictions for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.Cancers · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in prostate biopsy: diagnostic applications, risk stratification, and precision oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Multimodal artificial intelligence in urologic precision oncology: from algorithm to translational medicine (a systemized narrative review).Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate cancer is a prevalent malignancy among men and remains a major cause of cancer-related mortality. The increasing incidence of cases underscores the need for advancements in diagnostic methodologies. Artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as a transformative tool in addressing challenges in prostate cancer diagnostics, particularly in the analysis of histopathological whole-slide images and the refinement of algorithmic Gleason grading. Traditional diagnostic approaches, including the Gleason grading system and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, are subject to variability and inefficiencies, placing a significant burden on pathologists and potentially delaying accurate diagnoses. This report explores the role of AI-driven models, such as convolutional neural networks and clinically validated deep learning systems, in enhancing diagnostic accuracy for tumor detection and Gleason grading. These models incorporate advanced techniques, including ensemble learning, specialized pooling mechanisms, and semi-supervised learning, to improve efficiency in feature extraction. Additionally, AI models integrating PSA data have demonstrated improved accuracy in risk stratification, reducing the reliance on traditional PSA thresholds and minimizing unnecessary biopsies. However, challenges persist, such as inconsistencies in data sources, imaging domain shifts, and the absence of standardized stain normalization, which hinder AI's widespread clinical adoption. By examining the current technological landscape, this report highlights AI's potential to revolutionize prostate cancer diagnostics, enhancing workflow efficiency and diagnostic precision in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.