ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Dynamic brain glymphatic changes and cognitive function in COVID-19 recovered patients: a DTI-ALPS prospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- MRI Diffusion Tensor Image Analysis Along the Perivascular Space: Effects of Mean Tract Orientation Divergence.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- The brain washing system in sepsis-associated encephalopathy.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate brain glymphatic function in COVID-19 recovered patients using the non-invasive Diffusion Tensor Imaging-Analysis Along the Perivascular Space (DTI-ALPS) technique. The DTI-ALPS technique was employed to investigate changes in brain glymphatic function in these patients and explore correlations with cognitive function and fatigue. Materials and methods: Follow-up assessments were conducted at 1, 3, and 12 months post-recovery. A total of 31 patients completed follow-ups at all three time points, with 30 healthy controls (HCs) for comparison. Results: Compared to HCs, COVID-19 recovered patients showed a significant decline in MoCA scores at 3 months post-recovery ( Conclusion: This study demonstrates dynamic changes in brain glymphatic function in COVID-19 recovered patients, with a peak in activity at 3 months post-recovery. These changes are associated with cognitive function and mental fatigue, suggesting potential targets for addressing neurological symptoms of long COVID. The non-invasive DTI-ALPS technique proves to be a valuable tool for assessing brain glymphatic function in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.