Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40330299›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Do women with a history of breast cancer recommend risk-based breast cancer screening? An in-depth interview study.

Zi Lin Lim, Freda Giam, Renee Ying Xuan Wong, Jonathan Jun Kit Liow, Keri McCrickerd, Jingmei Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zi Lin Lim *Laboratory of Women's Health and Genetics, Genome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Freda Giam *Human Development, Institute for Human Development and Potential (IHDP), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Renee Ying Xuan WongLaboratory of Women's Health and Genetics, Genome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Jonathan Jun Kit LiowLaboratory of Women's Health and Genetics, Genome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Keri McCrickerdHuman Development, Institute for Human Development and Potential (IHDP), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Jingmei LiLaboratory of Women's Health and Genetics, Genome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Personalizing screening recommendations could enhance efficiency, support timely detection, and optimize resource use. This study explores women's perceptions of the facilitators and barriers to current screening guidelines and the implementation of risk-based screening (RBS) for breast cancer in Singapore. Methods: Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 women aged 21 and above with a history of breast cancer. Data coding and thematic analysis were guided by the Health Belief Model (HBM). Results: Five themes were identified and mapped to the Health Belief Model (HBM): (1) Knowledge and beliefs, (2) Access to mammography screening, (3) Social influences, (4) Healthcare delivery, and (5) Needs and preferences for RBS implementation. Key barriers to screening adherence included low perceived susceptibility, cost concerns, and accessibility issues. Factors that could improve adherence included social influences promoting breast health awareness, reminders from trusted healthcare professionals (HCP), and confidence in affording screening and treatment. Participants were generally receptive to RBS and valued personalized recommendations, but concerns were raised about risk prediction accuracy, insurance implications, and potential negative reactions to risk results. Conclusion: This study identifies challenges and enablers for enhancing breast screening in Singapore, based on the experiences of breast cancer survivors. Participants supported RBS for routine screening. Successful RBS implementation requires improved health literacy, HCP engagement, and accessible healthcare. Women's acceptance will rely on research to refine prediction accuracy and communication of risk results.

Indexed as

breast cancergenetic testmammographyqualitativerisk-based screeningSingapore

Identifiers

PMID40330299
PMCPMC12052940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.