ArticleJournal of orthopaedic translation2025
Allografts promote skeletal regeneration of periprosthetic femoral bone loss.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- "Multidisciplinary synergy driving innovation in orthopaedic translational medicine".Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Periprosthetic bone loss is a common clinical problem in hip arthroplasty that must be addressed during revision surgery to achieve adequate implant stability. Although bone allografts represent the clinical standard among substitute materials used, evidence of their regenerative potential at the microstructural, cellular, and compositional level is lacking. Methods: A multiscale imaging approach comprising contact radiography, undecalcified histology, scanning electron microscopy, and nanoindentation was employed on human femoral explants obtained postmortem many years after allograft use during revision surgery. Results: The degree of skeletal regeneration through allograft incorporation between host bone and allograft bone was highly dependent on the defect depth (R Conclusion: This is the first multiscale, histomorphometry-based evaluation of bone allografts used in revision hip arthroplasty for femoral bone loss in humans, demonstrating that they adequately facilitate skeletal regeneration through osteoconduction and subsequent remodelling. The translational potential of this article: This study identified the mechanisms and determinants of femoral defect regeneration through allografts on the basis of a unique sample collection. While our results support their favourable clinical outcomes, the scientific basis for incomplete incorporation is also demonstrated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.