ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2025
Validation of ICD-10 Consensus Code Set for Cirrhosis Detection Using Electronic Health Records in an Asian Population.
Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Positive predictive value of mpox diagnoses in French emergency departments: a retrospective validation study using the OSCOUR network.BMJ open · 2026Observational
- Estimating the Healthcare Cost of Infection-Related Hospitalisations in Multiple Myeloma.PharmacoEconomics · 2026Article
- Development and evaluation of a hybrid algorithm for identifying hospitalized patients with cirrhosis.Canadian liver journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Systematic identification of patients with cirrhosis through electronic healthcare records (EHRs) using ICD-10 codes is essential for epidemiological research but is prone to discrepancies. We aim to validate and improve a recent consensus code set of nine ICD-10 codes to identify cirrhosis in a multi-ethnic Asian population. Methods: We applied an initial broad algorithm of 25 ICD-10 codes related to cirrhosis and its complications to identify patients potentially with cirrhosis admitted to Singapore General Hospital in 2018 and confirmed true cirrhosis cases via manual EHR review. We evaluated the consensus code set's sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) in identifying cirrhosis cases. We examined alternative code sets to improve cirrhosis identification and validated them in another local hospital. Results: One thousand, seven hundred thirty-three patients potentially with cirrhosis were identified, with 937 (54.1%) confirmed. The median age at diagnosis was 71 years (IQR: 64-78), with 65.6% males, 75.2%/8.8%/9.3%/6.7% Chinese/Indians/Malays/Others, and 56.7% Child-Pugh A. The main etiologies were chronic hepatitis B (29.5%) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (25.5%). The consensus code set demonstrated sensitivity/specificity/PPV/NPV of 76.1%/82.0%/83.3%/74.5%, respectively. We identified a set of 10 ICD-10 codes (SingHealth Chronic Liver Disease Registry [SoLiDaRity]-10) with sensitivity/specificity/PPV/NPV of 76.5%/84.8%/85.6%/75.4%, respectively, demonstrating an improved specificity versus the consensus code set ( Conclusions: While the consensus code set performs well in identifying patients with cirrhosis in a multi-ethnic Asian population, we propose the improved SoLiDaRity-10 code set.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.