ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
Enhanced breast cancer diagnosis using modified InceptionNet-V3: a deep learning approach for ultrasound image classification.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Classification of acceleration and deceleration craniocerebral injuries by using cascaded deep learning models.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- An intelligent context-aware facial emotion recognition system for hearing-impaired individuals using large language models and neural network-based feature fusion.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Dual-database Bibliometric Analysis Combined with Gephi-based Network Visualization of Artificial Intelligence Applications in the Identification and Diagnosis of Thyroid Space-occupying Lesions.Current medical imaging · 2026Article
- LBNet: an optimized lightweight CNN for mammographic breast cancer classification with XAI-based interpretability.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A ResNet-50-UNet Hybrid with Whale Optimization Algorithm for Accurate Liver Tumor Segmentation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Breast cancer (BC) is a malignant neoplasm that originates in the mammary gland's cellular structures and remains one of the most prevalent cancers among women, ranking second in cancer-related mortality after lung cancer. Early and accurate diagnosis is crucial due to the heterogeneous nature of breast cancer and its rapid progression. However, manual detection and classification are often time-consuming and prone to errors, necessitating the development of automated and reliable diagnostic approaches. Methods: Recent advancements in deep learning have significantly improved medical image analysis, demonstrating superior predictive performance in breast cancer detection using ultrasound images. Despite these advancements, training deep learning models from scratch can be computationally expensive and data-intensive. Transfer learning, leveraging pre-trained models on large-scale datasets, offers an effective solution to mitigate these challenges. In this study, we investigate and compare multiple deep-learning models for breast cancer classification using transfer learning. The evaluated architectures include modified InceptionV3, GoogLeNet, ShuffleNet, AlexNet, VGG-16, and SqueezeNet. Additionally, we propose a deep neural network model that integrates features from modified InceptionV3 to further enhance classification performance. Results: The experimental results demonstrate that the modified InceptionV3 model achieves the highest classification accuracy of 99.10%, with a recall of 98.90%, precision of 99.00%, and an F1-score of 98.80%, outperforming all other evaluated models on the given datasets. Discussion: The achieved findings underscore the potential of the proposed approach in enhancing diagnostic precision and confirm the superiority of the modified InceptionV3 model in breast cancer classification tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.