ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Pilot Study: Hourglass Technique for Male Gluteal Enhancement.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessment of Hyaluronic Acid Filler in Gluteal Augmentation and Contouring: A 1-Year Prospective Study.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aesthetic demand for male gluteal augmentation is increasing; however, most existing techniques are designed for female anatomy, risking undesired feminization in male patients. This pilot study proposes the "hourglass technique" using hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers as a minimally invasive approach to enhance male gluteal contours while preserving masculine features. Methods: A total of 10 male patients 20-45 years of age underwent gluteal augmentation using a cross-linked HA filler (UP Max, Ilikia, CGBio). The hourglass technique targets 3 anatomical regions-upper pole, projection, and lower pole-while avoiding the trochanteric depression ("no touch area") to maintain natural contours. Injections were performed with an 18G cannula in the superficial subcutaneous plane. Safety, tolerance, and aesthetic outcomes were assessed clinically and via photographic documentation up to 30 days postprocedure. Results: All patients demonstrated enhanced gluteal definition and projection with the preservation of masculine traits and no feminization. No adverse events were reported, aside from mild localized pain and bruising. Results were stable and aesthetically satisfactory at the 30-day follow-up. Conclusions: The hourglass technique with HA fillers is a safe, effective, and reproducible option for subtle male gluteal enhancement. It preserves masculine anatomy and offers a minimally invasive alternative to surgery, warranting further investigation in studies with longer follow-up and larger samples.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.