Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40330165›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025

Evaluating the Environmental Impact of Quaternary Plastic Surgery: An Eco-audit of the Autologous Microtia Reconstruction Pathway.

Zahra Ahmed, Alexander Zargaran, Yasmin Kamel, Sara Sousi, Punn Tannirandorn, David Zargaran, Walid Sabbagh, Gregory O'Toole, Afshin Mosahebi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zahra AhmedFrom the University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Alexander ZargaranFrom the University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Yasmin KamelUniversity of Buckingham Medical School, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom.
Sara SousiFrom the University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Punn TannirandornFrom the University College London, London, United Kingdom.
David ZargaranFrom the University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Walid SabbaghRoyal Free NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Gregory O'TooleRoyal Free NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Afshin MosahebiFrom the University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Autologous microtia reconstruction is a highly specialized procedure with the potential to significantly improve patient quality of life. However, it has a complex patient pathway including a multistaged procedure, the environmental impact of which has yet to be explored. Methods: A retrospective study of 23 patients undergoing autologous microtia reconstruction at a single center was performed. Process mapping and life cycle analyses were performed for surgical and inpatient stay, including facilities, consumables, medical gases, equipment, food and linen, and travel. Estimates for carbon dioxide emissions were generated for each stage of the care pathway, with variability considered, as well as potential areas of savings. Results: This study estimated the carbon footprint of a patient undergoing autologous microtia reconstruction surgery to be approximately 1004.5 kgCO2eq. Inpatient stay had the highest overall contribution to the carbon footprint (447.5 kgCO2eq, 44.6% overall). From bottom-up calculations, patient travel was the predominant source of carbon emissions (464.2 kgCO2eq, 83.4%). Conclusions: This was the first study to estimate the carbon footprint of a quaternary plastic surgery procedure, using autologous microtia reconstruction as an example. Strategies to combat the impact of carbon emissions, including adapted models of care in a hub-and-spoke model, reduction in the use of anesthetic gases, and facilitating sustainable staff travel, were suggested areas for improvement.

Identifiers

PMID40330165
PMCPMC12055187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.