Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40330163›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025

Pilot Study: A Multicenter, Prospective Study Demonstrating Safety, Usability, and Feasibility of Perioperative 1-hour Electrical Stimulation Therapy for Enhancing Peripheral Nerve Regeneration.

Christopher J Coroneos, Carolyn Levis, Michael P Willand, Katelyn J W So, James R Bain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Advancing Peripheral Nerve Regeneration (Nerve SPACE 2025).Journal of hand surgery global online · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christopher J CoroneosFrom the Department of Surgery, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Carolyn LevisDivision of Plastic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Michael P WillandEpineuron Technologies, Inc., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Katelyn J W SoEpineuron Technologies, Inc., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
James R BainFrom the Department of Surgery, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Electrical stimulation (ES) applied for 1 hour following surgical intervention enhances axonal regeneration and functional outcomes. Clinical implementation, however, has been hindered due to the lack of appropriately designed stimulators. Methods: This multicenter, prospective, open-label study aimed to demonstrate the safety and device feasibility of a novel, single-use stimulator for implementing perioperative ES therapy in a variety of upper extremity surgical procedures. Patients undergoing surgical intervention for upper extremity nerve injury, neuropathy, or lesions were included. An investigational version of a novel therapeutic peripheral nerve stimulator was used to deliver 1-hour ES therapy perioperatively. Safety was assessed by the cumulation of adverse events. Patient tolerance to ES therapy was obtained during the treatment, and pain was also assessed at the first postoperative visit. Device usability questionnaires were completed by the study surgeons. Results: A total of 25 patients were enrolled. There were no related adverse events or adverse device effects. Implementation of the device took less than 5 minutes in the operating room in most cases. Bipolar stimulation was preferred, with a mean ± SD stimulus level of 2.2 ± 0.7 mA, and therapy was well tolerated. The mean first postoperative pain score was 1.2 out of 10. Surgeons indicated that perioperative implementation of the therapeutic peripheral nerve stimulator was easy and did not cause major disruptions to the clinical workflow. Conclusions: Perioperative application of 1-hour ES therapy is a feasible, safe, and promising approach to enhancing peripheral nerve regeneration as an adjunct to surgical intervention.

Identifiers

PMID40330163
PMCPMC12055111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.