ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2025
Malignancy Workup in Cryptogenic Stroke: A Survey of Canadian Stroke and Thrombosis Experts.
Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The diagnostic workup for patients with cryptogenic stroke includes investigating for occult cancer, which is known to increase the risk of stroke. Current guidelines do not provide specific recommendations regarding the optimal approach for occult cancer screening after cryptogenic stroke. We surveyed Canadian stroke and thrombosis physicians to determine current workup preferences for detecting occult cancer after cryptogenic stroke. Methods: We designed and distributed an anonymous online survey targeting physicians who manage patients with cryptogenic stroke through professional memberships of the Canadian Stroke Consortium and Thrombosis Canada. Using 4 clinical scenarios representative of patients with cryptogenic stroke with different ages (younger or older than 50 years) and from both sexes, we asked respondents which tests they routinely recommend when investigating for occult cancer among a list of laboratory investigations, imaging, and procedures. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: We received 138 responses to 5 survey questions. The most commonly recommended investigations were complete blood count (79%), creatinine (63%), and coagulation tests (56%), and the most frequently recommended imaging test was CT of the abdomen and pelvis (39%). A minority of respondents indicated they would order guideline-directed age-appropriate cancer screening. Approximately half of surveyed specialists deferred the workup of cancer to a primary care physician, and 12% did not suggest any cancer workup at all. Discussion: This survey of stroke and thrombosis experts found heterogeneity in testing for cancer screening in patients with cryptogenic stroke, with the majority either not screening at all or deferring tests to primary care providers. Our survey highlights the need for better evidence and evidence-based recommendations to guide the approach to cancer screening in this population.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.