ArticlePCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences2025
Investigating the association of self-image and brain maps in medical students: A quantitative electroencephalography study.
Article in PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Investigating the association of self-image and brain maps in medical students: A quantitative electroencephalography study.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Self-image, conceived as one's mental blueprint and a composite of thoughts, is among the hotly debated topics in psychology. Exploring the brain's structure, functionality, and physiology has also proven crucial in understanding one's self-image. In this vein, the current study aimed to examine the relationship between quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) findings and medical students' self-image. Methods: To measure self-image, the Offer Self-Image Questionnaire and, for the QEEG findings, a Mitsar EEG-202 device were used. To analyze the QEEG findings, the FDA-approved Neuroguide software was utilized. Results: In the first phase, out of the 93 questionnaires returned, the maximum score, on a scale of 1 to 6, was 5.52 and the minimum was 2.36. Hence, it could be argued that the medical students who took part in this study had relatively high self-images. Results, however, showed no significant difference between the two genders regarding either their overall self-image score or any of its subcategories. In the second phase, the QEEG analyses of high- and low-self-image students suggested a statistically significant difference in their θ signal of the frontal lobes. Further analysis indicated that the difference was not localized to any single lead or lobe, but pertained to the overall function of the prefrontal cortices. Conclusion: The relationship observed between medical students' self-image and their brain θ waves could contribute to a better understanding of people's cognitive functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.