ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2025
Artificial intelligence prediction of carcinoembryonic antigen structure and interactions relevant for colorectal cancer.
Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Targeted Inhibition of Colorectal Carcinoma Using a Designed CEA-Binding Protein to Deliver p53 Protein and TCF/LEF Transcription Factor Decoy DNA.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is used as a biomarker for colorectal cancer. It is expressed during fetal development but in healthy adult cells the expression is low. Due to its size and the high degree of glycosylation, there are no structures available for mature CEA. By employing novel structure prediction methods, we aim to investigate CEA tertiary structure and interactions. Alphafold 3 server has increased the accuracy of structure predictions and allows for modelling of glycans in proteins and complexes. Models were created for a monomeric CEA, dimeric CEA and for CEA in complex with the antibody Tusamitamab. The structure of the monomeric glycosylated CEA exhibit two bends, one in the domain interface B1-A2 and one in the domain interface B2-A3. The dimer structure pairs in a parallel manner, with direct contacts in the N and the A2 domains of the two chains. The complex of CEA with Tusamitamab closely resembles the EM structure of the complex that was released after the training of Alphafold 3 was completed. Overall, the investigations give new angles to investigate for CEA. The predicted bend, primarily in the B2 and A3 domain interface, would allow for dimer formation of CEA from both the same cell as from adjacent cells and could help to explain the outstanding issue on how it can fulfil both tasks. The prediction of the antibody binding to CEA was accurate, the all-atom RMSD was 1.3 Å. This is encouraging for other antibody - protein complexes predictions as the complex structure was not part of the training set for Alphafold 3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.