Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40330071›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging2025

A comparative analysis of binary and multi-class classification machine learning algorithms to detect current frailty status using the English longitudinal study of ageing (ELSA).

Charmayne Mary Lee Hughes, Yan Zhang, Ali Pourhossein, Terezia Jurasova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Charmayne Mary Lee HughesAge-Appropriate Human-Machine Systems, Institute of Psychology and Ergonomics, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Yan ZhangAge-Appropriate Human-Machine Systems, Institute of Psychology and Ergonomics, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ali PourhosseinAge-Appropriate Human-Machine Systems, Institute of Psychology and Ergonomics, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Terezia JurasovaAge-Appropriate Human-Machine Systems, Institute of Psychology and Ergonomics, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Physical frailty is a pressing public health issue that significantly increases the risk of disability, hospitalization, and mortality. Early and accurate detection of frailty is essential for timely intervention, reducing its widespread impact on healthcare systems, social support networks, and economic stability. Objective: This study aimed to classify frailty status into binary (frail vs. non-frail) and multi-class (frail vs. pre-frail vs. non-frail) categories. The goal was to detect and classify frailty status at a specific point in time. Model development and internal validation were conducted using data from wave 8 of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), with external validation using wave 6 data to assess model generalizability. Methods: Nine classification algorithms, including Logistic Regression, Random Forest, K-nearest Neighbor, Gradient Boosting, AdaBoost, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, and Multi-Layer Perceptron, were evaluated and their performance compared. Results: CatBoost demonstrated the best overall performance in binary classification, achieving high recall (0.951), balanced accuracy (0.928), and the lowest Brier score (0.049) on the internal validation set, and maintaining strong performance externally with a recall of 0.950, balanced accuracy of 0.913, and F1-score of 0.951. Multi-class classification was more challenging, with Gradient Boosting emerging as the top model, achieving the highest recall (0.666) and precision (0.663) on the external validation set, with a strong F1-score (0.664) and reasonable calibration (Brier Score = 0.223). Conclusion: Machine learning algorithms show promise for the detection of current frailty status, particularly in binary classification. However, distinguishing between frailty subcategories remains challenging, highlighting the need for improved models and feature selection strategies to enhance multi-class classification accuracy.

Indexed as

agingelderlyELSAfrailtyhealthcaremachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40330071
PMCPMC12052818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.