Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40330021›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025

Reference range of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in healthy individuals and its predictive value for post-trauma nosocomial infections.

Qiang Wang, Yu Jiang, Feifei Jin, Lebin Gan, Rui Li, Diya Sun, Mengwei Zhang, Zishuo Pei, Jingyao Zhang, Jingjing Ye and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Qiang Wang *Trauma Treatment Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Key Laboratory of Trauma Treatment and Neural Regeneration (Peking University) Ministry of Education, National Center for Trauma Medicine, Beijing, China.
Yu Jiang *Department of Clinical Laboratory, Chengdu Integrated TCM & Western Medicine Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Feifei Jin *Trauma Treatment Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Key Laboratory of Trauma Treatment and Neural Regeneration (Peking University) Ministry of Education, National Center for Trauma Medicine, Beijing, China.
Lebin GanTrauma Treatment Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Key Laboratory of Trauma Treatment and Neural Regeneration (Peking University) Ministry of Education, National Center for Trauma Medicine, Beijing, China.
Rui LiTrauma Treatment Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Key Laboratory of Trauma Treatment and Neural Regeneration (Peking University) Ministry of Education, National Center for Trauma Medicine, Beijing, China.
Diya SunTrauma Treatment Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Key Laboratory of Trauma Treatment and Neural Regeneration (Peking University) Ministry of Education, National Center for Trauma Medicine, Beijing, China.
Mengwei ZhangTrauma Treatment Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Key Laboratory of Trauma Treatment and Neural Regeneration (Peking University) Ministry of Education, National Center for Trauma Medicine, Beijing, China.
Zishuo PeiTrauma Treatment Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Key Laboratory of Trauma Treatment and Neural Regeneration (Peking University) Ministry of Education, National Center for Trauma Medicine, Beijing, China.
Jingyao ZhangTrauma Treatment Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Key Laboratory of Trauma Treatment and Neural Regeneration (Peking University) Ministry of Education, National Center for Trauma Medicine, Beijing, China.
Jingjing YeTrauma Treatment Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Key Laboratory of Trauma Treatment and Neural Regeneration (Peking University) Ministry of Education, National Center for Trauma Medicine, Beijing, China.
Tianbing WangTrauma Treatment Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Key Laboratory of Trauma Treatment and Neural Regeneration (Peking University) Ministry of Education, National Center for Trauma Medicine, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to establish the reference range of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte absolute ratio (NLR) in healthy individuals, explore the association between NLR and post-trauma nosocomial infections, and evaluate the effectiveness of NLR in predicting clinical outcomes of post-trauma infections. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted based on medical records of acute trauma patients from the China National Center for Trauma Medical and health examination data from Chengdu First People's Hospital, Sichuan Province. The reference range of NLR was established, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for infection, with subgroup analysis conducted by age. The predictive value of NLR for post-trauma infections was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: A total of 175,019 individuals were included, comprising 165,504 healthy individuals (753 minors [0.45%, <18 years] and 164,751 adults [99.55%]) and 9,515 acute trauma patients (8,602 in the control group [90.40%] and 913 with post-trauma infections [9.60%]). The 2.5th-97.5th percentile range for NLR was 0.69-3.48 in minors and 0.86-3.83 in adults. NLR was identified as an independent risk factor for post-trauma infections, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.43 (95% CI: 1.18-1.73). Additionally, NLR showed a positive correlation with common inflammatory markers, CRP (r = 0.37 [0.32-0.42], weak correlation) and PCT (r = 0.52 [0.45-0.58], moderate correlation). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated that NLR had an AUC of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.69-0.73, Conclusion: The current 2.5th-97.5th percentile range of NLR is 0.69-3.48 in minors and 0.86-3.83 in adults. With increasing age, the reference range widens, and females tend to have a slightly broader range than males. NLR is an independent risk factor for post-trauma infections, showing higher predictive value in patients over 60 years of age. Although NLR cannot differentiate infection sites or pathogen types, elevated NLR values may provide a reference for identifying fungal infections.

Indexed as

Cross InfectionLymphocytesNeutrophilsWounds and InjuriesAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolChinaFemaleHumansLeukocyte CountLymphocyte CountMaleMiddle AgedinfectionNLRreference rangerisk factorstrauma

Identifiers

PMID40330021
PMCPMC12053171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.